Iowa
Learning from institutional pass rates on elementary teacher licensure tests
Overview
The nation needs a strong, diverse teacher workforce to live up to its promise of equal opportunity for all.
Pass rate data illuminates the challenges that must be overcome to achieve a strong, diverse teacher workforce.
Currently, policymakers, state education agencies, and teacher prep programs have little insight into when aspiring teachers leave the path into the classroom, largely due to missing or inaccurate data. This makes it hard to identify when and why aspiring teachers exit the pipeline and where to focus efforts and resources to support them.
Here NCTQ shares new data, never before published, on a pivotal point in the pipeline for elementary teachers: when aspiring teachers take licensure tests, one of the final steps before earning a teaching license. Pass rates, or the rate at which teacher candidates pass their licensing tests, serve as a compass, pointing toward strengths and opportunities in preparing teacher candidates.
With this information, states and programs now have the opportunity to look at the data from multiple perspectives. Each lens conveys important insights on the quality of institutions’ preparation, their level of encouragement and support for retaking a failed test, persistence on the part of test takers, as well as commitment and innovation to overcome educational inequities and inadequate K-12 preparation.
NCTQ is making each state’s data available for download to encourage additional analysis, urging states and institutions to consider stronger data systems that capture this data on an ongoing basis.
The Problem
Why do licensure tests matter?
There’s little disagreement among teachers, parents, teacher educators, and state officials that teachers need to know the content they will teach.
Teachers cannot teach what they do not know. Elementary teachers should demonstrate that they know core content before they start teaching, according to 95% of state education agency leaders, 84% of prep program leaders, and 98% of teachers.
Licensure tests are the most common way to measure an elementary teacher’s content knowledge. When well designed, they are:
- Comparable
- Reliable
- Scaleable
- Comprehensive
- Cost Effective
While more could always be done to remove bias from the test instrument itself and the test experience, licensure tests also undergo a rigorous bias review process.
And where states have done the research, almost all studies find evidence that they predict future teacher effectiveness.
Currently, the public learns little about the performance of Iowa's prep programs from the pass rate data collected by the federal government.
All states already report pass rate data through the Title II requirement of the Higher Education Act. However, this data does not include key information such as:
- First-time pass rates
- Number of attempts to pass the test
- Pass rates broken out by race/ethnicity of test takers
- Proportion of test takers who pass all sections of the test
- Proportion of test takers who walk away after failing their first attempt
Analysis for Iowa
Exploring pass rate data through many different lenses helps to identify successful institutions who get the most teacher candidates across the finish line.
Explore analysis by:
Equipped with the data included here, state and teacher prep program leaders can determine what outcomes they value with regard to building a strong, diverse, knowledgeable teacher workforce, and can evaluate the data through the lens of not just one but multiple values.
The following examples illustrate different approaches to analyzing pass rate data and how these approaches can help identify institutions with strong preparation programs that may offer guidance for their peers.
Best-Attempt Pass Rates
Teacher candidates have multiple opportunities to pass their test. To explore where most test takers are passing, regardless of the number of attempts, examine institutions’ best attempt pass rates.
Consider these questions when exploring the data
Best-attempt pass rates
Some questions can be answered based on data presented here, while others invite further exploration.
- How much variation is there between institutions’ pass rates?
- Where do test takers struggle to pass even after their best attempt?
- What are the stand-out institutions doing to support their candidates?
The average best-attempt pass rate in Iowa is 93%, with institutions ranging from 78% to 100%.
One way some states report the data is ‘best-attempt’ pass rates—the number of test takers who pass regardless of the number of attempts. When reported for all test takers, this gives an accurate but limited picture.
Examining these pass rates at the institution level illustrates which institutions help test takers across the licensure test finish line.
While this data is informative, it obscures the burden on candidates from having to take a test multiple times before passing, perhaps because they did not receive adequate preparation.
First-Attempt Pass Rates
As having to take the test multiple times costs candidates additional money and delays in being able to get a teaching job, first-attempt pass rates offer an important perspective on the data.
Consider these questions when exploring the data
First-attempt pass rates
Some questions can be answered based on data presented here, while others invite further exploration.
- How much variation is there between the institutions with the highest and lowest first-time pass rate?
- At institutions where test takers struggle, what could they do to foster greater success?
- What are the stand-out institutions doing to support their candidates?
In Iowa, 81% of test takers pass the elementary licensure test on their first attempt, but this average masks significant variation among institutions.
This measure of how many test takers pass on their first attempt offers further insight into whether candidates have to expend time and money on multiple retakes, and whether programs offer content preparation that aligns with the state’s expectations.
For states and preparation programs, the first-attempt pass rate can identify potential gaps in preparation and point toward the need for better support for candidates, such as course requirements more aligned with the needs of elementary teachers.
Walk-Away Rates
To identify where aspiring teachers get lost in the pipeline, examine the walk-away rate—the proportion of test takers who fail on their first attempt and do not retake the test.
Consider these questions when exploring the data
Walk-away rates
Some questions can be answered based on data presented here, while others invite further exploration.
- How many aspiring teachers does my state lose each year after they fail their licensure test?
- How are institutions with lower “walk-away rates” supporting their candidates?
- Who stops attempting the test after failing the first time? How can those test takers be better supported?
Iowa was not able to provide data on test takers’ number of attempts that could be used to calculate the walk-away rate. This lens provides an EXAMPLE from another state to illustrate what can be learned from this data.
The following graphs illustrate example walk-away rates from another state
In the aggregate, low first-attempt pass rates may point to a misalignment between the preparation candidates receive and the state’s expectations for future elementary teachers.
On an individual level, failing these tests can be demoralizing, causing delays in job searches and unforeseen expenses to study for and retake the test.
Because retake numbers are not available on composite or assessment-level scores, when a state requires a test with multiple subtests, this analysis uses the subtest with the lowest pass rate. Test takers must pass each subtest in order to pass the overall test (though not necessarily in the same sitting), so using the lowest-scoring subtest best illustrates the challenges test takers face.
Notes
In this EXAMPLE STATE, a quarter of test takers who fail this content knowledge subtest on the first attempt do not try again. This rate varies among the EXAMPLE STATE’s institutions from 0% to 83%.
Three or More Attempts
To explore where test takers are more likely to succeed with the least amount of time and money spent on test-taking, examine retake rates.
Consider these questions when exploring the data
Three or more attempts
Some questions can be answered based on data presented here, while others invite further exploration.
- What supports do test takers need if they’re retaking the test multiple times?
- What can institutions do to help test takers succeed with fewer retakes?
- Pass rate data for this subtest for each institution can be downloaded at the link below. Among institutions with similar retake rates, which have higher or lower pass rates?
Iowa was not able to provide data on test takers’ number of attempts. This lens provides an EXAMPLE from another state to illustrate what can be learned from this data.
High percentages of test takers who take the test three or more times may indicate systemic problems such as low admissions standards, inadequate support, or too little attention to the content coursework candidates take.
Notes
In this EXAMPLE state, 5% of test takers take the science subtest 3 or more times.
Pass Rates by Admissions Selectivity
To identify and scale practices from institutions that successfully support all groups of test takers, sort pass rate data by categories such as admissions selectivity.
Consider these questions when exploring the data
Pass rates by admissions selectivity
Some questions can be answered based on data presented here, while others invite further exploration.
- How much variation is there between institutions’ pass rates within the same band of selectivity?
- At which less selective institutions do test takers earn higher pass rates?
- What are the stand-out institutions doing to support their candidates?
Iowa has two institutions with lower levels of selectivity and high pass rates.
Organizing pass rate data by the admissions selectivity of the program or institution helps to identify places that are less selective and also achieve higher pass rates.
Notes
Graph updated 9/5/2021.
Admissions selectivity for traditional institutions is measured using their undergraduate elementary program ratings from the 2021 Teacher Prep Review. In the absence of a rating, an equivalent score (identified in the graph hover-over by an asterisk) was determined using institutional median SAT/ACT scores or Barron’s selectivity ratings. Selectivity for alternative certification programs was determined using non-traditional program ratings from the 2021 Teacher Prep Review. See more here: www.nctq.org/review/standard/Admissions#scoringRubric. ‘Very selective’ represents an A on the Teacher Prep Review Admissions standard or its scoring equivalent, ‘Selective’ a B, ‘Moderately selective’ a C, ‘Less selective’ a D, and ‘Not selective’ an F. Institutions with a C, D, or F were classified as having “lower admissions selectivity.”
Based on input from the American Association of Community Colleges, all community colleges are identified as “Not selective.”
Pass Rates by Socioeconomic Factors
To identify and scale practices from institutions that successfully support all groups of test takers, sort pass rate data by categories such as the proportion of Pell grant recipients at the institution.
Consider these questions when exploring the data
Pass rates by socioeconomic factors
Some questions can be answered based on data presented here, while others invite further exploration.
- How much variation is there between institutions’ pass rates with higher or lower proportions of Pell grant recipients?
- What are the stand-out institutions doing to support their test takers?
- What additional supports may be valuable for institutions with more Pell grant recipients?
Iowa has five institutions with a high proportion of Pell grant recipients and high pass rates.
Notes
Proportion of Pell grant recipients refers to all undergraduate students at the institution, and not specifically to test takers.
Pass Rates for Test Takers of Color
To identify institutions supporting teachers of color in entering the workforce, examine pass rate data for test takers of color.
Consider these questions when exploring the data
Pass rates for test takers of color
Some questions can be answered based on data presented here, while others invite further exploration.
- Which institutions have higher pass rates for test takers of color?
- Pass rates for all test takers, and for white test takers, can be downloaded at the link below. Which institutions have closed the gap in pass rates for test takers of color and white test takers?
- At which institutions could greater supports for test takers of color help to bring more teachers of color into the workforce?
Iowa's institutions vary widely in first-attempt and best-attempt pass rates for test takers of color.
Notes
Briar Cliff University, Central College, Clarke University, Coe College, Cornell College, Dordt University (formerly Dordt College), Drake University, Emmaus Bible College, Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary, Grand View University, Iowa Wesleyan University, Loras College, Luther College, Morningside College, Mount Mercy University, Northwestern College, St. Ambrose University, Simpson College, University of Dubuque, University of Iowa, Upper Iowa University, Waldorf University, Wartburg College, and William Penn University have too few test takers of color to report pass rates.
Standout Institutions
When viewed through these different lenses, some institutions stand out for supporting their test takers in passing licensing tests.
Briar Cliff University
- The institution has more Pell grant recipients (42%) than average (35%) and exceeds the state’s first-attempt average pass rate.
- The institution’s average first-attempt pass rate on the Praxis II Elementary Education: Content Knowledge (5018) test is 84%, compared with 81% across the state.
Emmaus Bible College
- The institution has more Pell grant recipients (42%) than average (35%) and exceeds the state’s first-attempt average pass rate.
- The institution’s average first-attempt pass rate on the Praxis II Elementary Education: Content Knowledge (5018) test is 88%, compared with 81% across the state.
Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary
- The institution has more Pell grant recipients (48%) than average (35%) and exceeds the state’s first-attempt average pass rate.
- The institution’s average first-attempt pass rate on the Praxis II Elementary Education: Content Knowledge (5018) test is 100%, compared with 81% across the state.
Iowa State University
- First-attempt pass rates for test takers of color at this institution exceeds the state’s average first-time pass rate.
- The average first-attempt pass rate for test takers of color at this institution on the Praxis II Elementary Education: Content Knowledge (5018) test is 89%, compared with 81% across the state.
Mount Mercy University
- The institution is moderately selective and exceeds the state’s average first-attempt pass rate.
- The institution also has more Pell grant recipients (37%) than average (35%) and exceeds the state’s first-attempt average pass rate.
- The institution’s average first-attempt pass rate on the Praxis II Elementary Education: Content Knowledge (5018) test is 91%, compared with 81% across the state.
Waldorf University
- The institution is not selective and exceeds the state’s average first-attempt pass rate.
- The institution also has more Pell grant recipients (49%) than average (35%) and exceeds the state’s first-attempt average pass rate.
- The institution’s average first-attempt pass rate on the Praxis II Elementary Education: Content Knowledge (5018) test is 84%, compared with 81% across the state.
Recommendations
Building a path together
State education agencies, teacher prep programs, testing companies, and school districts together, should create or verify alignment between what’s taught in elementary classrooms, what’s expected in teacher prep coursework, and what’s assessed on licensure tests.
The following recommendations build upon this foundation of aligned content.
Teacher prep programs:
- Look to coursework, not just test prep strategies, to best prepare candidates in the content they need to teach elementary grades.
- Review and act on pass rate data to monitor program effectiveness and to inform improvements.
- Use diagnostic testing to identify candidates’ strengths and weaknesses.
States:
- Use a valid and reliable elementary education licensure test that separately measures knowledge of language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies.
- Set the minimum score needed to pass the licensure test at the score that has been recommended by the standard setting process.
- Improve access to and use of assessment data.
- Make sure that the state’s needs are reflected in agreements made with licensure test publishers.
Testing Companies
- Standard operating procedure should be to provide first-attempt and best-attempt pass rate data and data on the number of attempts for all test takers at the institution level to state education agencies and preparation programs.
- Strengthen data collection to provide more accurate program-level data.
- Work with the education field to explore concerns around bias in testing.
This data is a powerful tool for change. Low pass rates should not be hidden, but rather brought to light; facing these challenges is how we build a stronger, more diverse teacher workforce for our students.
While prep programs did not create the systemic educational inequities that contribute to struggles in passing licensure content exams, they – with support from their institutions, state education agencies, and testing companies – are in a prime position to take action to close these gaps. It is NOT the demographic makeup of the student population, but the commitment of the institution to adequately prepare candidates for licensure exams and more importantly, for the classroom, that makes all the difference. With better data, states and programs can better direct their resources to support candidates in achieving success.
Download the national report for the full set of recommendationsWhat’s next?
Improvement is possible
Students need teachers who enter the classroom already knowing core content. Licensure tests act as a guardrail to make sure that teachers have essential knowledge from their first day on the job. Data from licensure tests offer a powerful tool to spotlight systemic inequities in content knowledge and to help identify institutions that are successfully preparing candidates for the classroom and those that need extra support.
Download Iowa data